Frequently Asked Questions
“Actual knowledge” is defined in §382.107 and means that an employer has knowledge that a driver has used alcohol or controlled substances based on the employer’s direct observation of the employee, information provided by the driver’s previous employer(s), a traffic citation for driving a CMV while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances or an employee’s admission of alcohol or controlled substance use, except as provided in §382.121. Direct observation as used in this definition means “observation of alcohol or controlled substances use” while a driver is subject to performing a safety-sensitive function, “and does not include observation of employee behavior or physical characteristics sufficient to warrant reasonable suspicion testing under §382.307.”
Last Updated : May 13, 2015
Yes, however, the selection of an alternate driver for random testing is only permissible if the primary driver selected will not be available for testing for the entire selection period because of long-term absence due to layoff, illness, injury, vacation or other circumstances. Please see [§382.305, Question 18].
Last Updated : May 20, 2015
The Form MCS-150C requires a "Principal Address," which is where the company's safety records are maintained. FMCSA will use this address for on-site visits to intermodal equipment providers for the purpose of conducting roadability reviews. It seems likely that the records required by § 396.12 and other provisions of the IEP final rule (73 FR 76794) will be maintained near the place where intermodal equipment is tendered and returned. The form also requires a "Mailing Address." This is the address where the company wants all its FMCSA correspondence to be sent (this may be a P.O. Box). If an IEP wants to list a foreign address, it should use the "Mailing Address" block on the form.
Last Updated : April 3, 2014
Intrastate drivers are subject to the physical qualification regulations of their States. All 50 States have adapted their regulations based on some of the Federal requirements. Many states grant waivers for certain medical conditions.
NOTE: FedEx, UPS and DHL drivers usually do not leave the state but are subject to interstate regulations.
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
Motor carriers submit MIS drug and alcohol reports to FMCSA upon FMCSA request. Every motor carrier shall prepare and maintain their previous year’s drug and alcohol MIS report in a safe and secure location, with controlled access, and make them available for inspection when requested by authorized personnel. These records should be maintained for a period of 5 years. See 49 CFR §382.403 for more information. Every year FMCSA randomly selects a group of motor carriers to report their MIS results. If you are selected, you will receive a notice with a username and password to file your previous year’s MIS drug and alcohol results online. If you are notified by FMCSA to report your previous year’s MIS results, you are required to formally submit your MIS drug and alcohol results to FMCSA. See §382.403 reporting of alcohol and controlled substances testing program results in a management information systems. FMCSA expects a 100% response rate from motor carriers selected to report their previous year’s drug and alcohol testing results Motor carriers that don’t respond to the notice requesting submission of MIS results may be subject to civil penalties of up $1,000 dollars per day that the motor carrier fails to comply.
Last Updated : May 14, 2015
No. Carriers are not required to comply with the permitting requirements before they apply for their Hazardous Materials Safety Permit during the phase-in period. FMCSA recommends companies set up these systems ahead of applying for their HM Safety Permit to make sure they work and will be in compliance once the permit is issued.
Last Updated : April 15, 2014
Yes, Drivers for government agencies who operate vehicles that require aCDL, and are not otherwise exempted in §382.103(d) are subject to DOT drug and alcohol testing.
The statutory definition of “employer” for Part 382, applies to any person including the United States, a State or a political subdivision of a State, and the District of Columbia, that owns or leases a commercial motor vehicle or assigns employees to operate a commercial motor vehicle. §382.103(c) specifically provides that the exceptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for Federal, State, and local government agencies do not apply to the FMCSA drug and alcohol testing requirements in Part 382. The only exceptions to the requirements of part 382 are found in §382.103.
Last Updated : May 14, 2015
No. There is no regulation that requires CMV drivers to be CPR certified.
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
Drivers are required to have a DOT Medical Certificate:
If they operate a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR), gross combination weight rating (GCWR), gross vehicle weight (GVW), or gross combination weight (GCW) of 10,001 pounds (4,536 kilograms) or more in interstate commerce.
If they operate a motor vehicle designed or used to transport more than 15 passengers (including the driver) in interstate commerce.
If they operate a motor vehicle designed or used to transport between 9 and 15 passengers, for direct compensation.
If they transport hazardous materials, in a quantity requiring placards, in interstate commerce.
However, an individual operating a covered farm vehicle, as defined in §390.5, is not required to have a DOT Medical Certificate
Q. Are drivers of commercial motor vehicles transporting sand for fracking operations considered to be specialized oilfield equipment and eligible for relief pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR) § 395.1(d)(2)) and the corresponding regulatory guidance Question 8?
A. A vehicle of any type, regardless of use may be considered specialized oilfield equipment if it fits the criteria in paragraph 1 of Regulatory Guidance Question 8, which indicates that the vehicle is: (1) specially constructed for use at oil and gas well sites, and (2) for which the operators require extensive training in the operation of the complex equipment, in addition to driving the vehicle.
Based on this information frack sand truck operators can assess their equipment and driver training and determine whether they meet the criteria for specialized oilfield equipment in the regulatory guidance Question 8 to § 395.1. FMCSA will work on amending Regulatory Guidance Question 8 to reflect this decision.
Questions regarding this action should be directed to Paul Bomgardner, Chief of the Hazardous Materials Division at (202)493-0027; or by email at paul.bomgardner@dot.gov.
Last Updated : April 16, 2018
Transportation performed by the Federal government, a State, or any political subdivision of a State, or an agency established under a compact between states that has been approved by the Congress of the United States are exempt from the FMCSRs, if the political entity chooses.
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
No. Government entities do not fall under the definition of a motor carrier. Private contractors working for a government entity are considered motor carriers and are covered by the HM Safety Permit regulations.
Last Updated : April 14, 2014
Drivers of CMV who operate in interstate commerce must be medically qualified in accordance with 49 CFR 391.41
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
No. The roadability reviews conducted on IEPs are non-rated; no safety rating will be issued.
Last Updated : April 7, 2014
Part 393 is revised to make it applicable to IEPs, in addition to motor carriers.
Every IEP and its employees or agents responsible for the inspection, repair, and maintenance of intermodal equipment (IME) interchanged to motor carriers must be knowledgeable of and comply with the applicable requirements and specifications of this part.
No IEP may operate IME, or cause or permit such equipment to be operated, unless it is equipped in accordance with the requirements and specifications of this part.
Last Updated : April 3, 2014
The intermodal equipment provider (IEP) final rule (73 FR 76794) revised § 396 to make it applicable to IEPs, in addition to motor carriers. The final rule added a new section on driver vehicle-inspection reports and systems for reporting damage, defects, or deficiencies in the intermodal equipment (IME).
Last Updated : April 3, 2014
The FMCSRs do not address this issue.
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
Regulatory requirements take precedence over the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. There are potential subtle interpretations that can cause significant problems for the Medical Examiner. What information must or can be turned over to the carrier is a legal issue, and if in doubt, the examiner should obtain a legal opinion. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation 391.43 does not address or prohibit the sharing of medical information by Medical Examiners. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
No, the FMCSA does not have duties. The Medical Examiner is required to know the FMCSA driver physical qualification standards, medical guidelines, and advisory criteria. The examiner should understand the mental and physical demands of operating a CMV.
Last Updated : April 1, 2014
Although prior statutory exemptions involving agriculture are unchanged, some of these exemptions overlap with the MAP-21 provisions. In these cases, regulated entities will be able to choose the exemption, or set of exemptions, under which to operate. They must, however, comply fully with the terms of each exemption they claim. The potentially overlapping provisions are in Parts 383, 391, and 395.
Last Updated : May 8, 2014