|
|
|
First Phase Report: Appendix A Table A-5
|
|
|
Print  
|
|
Hazardous Materials Serious Crash Analysis:
First Phase Final Report
|
6. What are the shortcomings of the data that you are using?
Table A-5. Summary of Question 6 Results
| | FMCSA HQ Manager | FMCSA Field HM Expert | FMCSA HQ MCMIS Expert | FAA HM Expert | Chemical Industry HM Expert | HM Carrier Association Official | Explosives Group Official | Chemical Industry HM Expert | State HM Enforcement Official | HM Carrier Representative | HM Carrier Association Official | RSPA HM Expert | USCG HM Expert | NHTSA HM Expert | RSPA_HMIS Expert | State HM Enforcement Official | State HM Enforcement Official | State HM Enforcement Official | HM Carrier Association official | State HM Enforcement Official | State HM Association Official | TOTAL |
| Lack of Details or Actual Data | X | | X | X | X | X | | X | | | | X | | | | | | | | | X | 8 |
| Commodity Flow | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Package Population Numbers | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Incident Causes and Package Failures | X | | X | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 |
| Successes | X | | | | X | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 3 |
| Pre-Crash | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| The "Middle Number" - How Much Hazmat is Flying | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Conditional Release Probability Data (container design, release size) | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Modal Data (rail, truck, barge, etc.) | | | | | X | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 2 |
| Bulk Containers in 5800.1 Report | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| More Accurate Accident Rate Data for all Modes | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| No Central Data Repository for Motor Carrier Data | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Denominator (or exposure data) Often Limited | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Uniformity | | X | | | X | | | X | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 4 |
| Difficulty in Relating Different Databases | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Differences Between Definition of Incidents | | | | | X | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 |
| Differences Between Definition of Shipments | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Marine Industry Needs Same Shipping Paper, Marking, Labeling, and Placarding Requirements | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Source Specific Complaints | | | X | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | 3 |
| Quality and quantity problems with MCMIS | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| "SafeStat" does not show a carrier's safety performance over time | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| "SafeStat" not comprehensive due to some states lagging behind on reporting | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Regarding MCS-82 or 90 no follow up notice given when liability insurance is cancelled | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | 1 |
| General |
X |
X |
X |
| | |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
| |
X |
X |
| | |
X |
11 |
| Timeliness | | X | | | | | | | X | | | | X | | | X | X | | | | X | 6 |
| Limitations of self reported data | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Cumbersome, poor indexing, not user friendly | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Company identification frequently a problem | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Underreporting | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Quality is uneven | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| Accessibility of information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | 1 |
| Completeness and accuracy of data | X | X | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | 4 |
|
|
|
|