FMCSA Contact: Joe DeLorenzo, MC-EFM-SV, (708) 283-3572
The goal of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is to reduce commercial vehicle related fatalities, as well as the number of persons injured in commercial vehicle related crashes, by 50 percent by the year 2010.
FMCSAs Research and Technology programs encompass a range
of issues and disciplines, all related to motor carrier and bus safety and
security. FMCSA defines a research
program as any systematic study
directed toward fuller scientific discovery, knowledge, or understanding that
will improve safety and security, and reduce the number and severity of
commercial motor vehicle crashes.
Similarly, a technology program includes those that adopt, develop,
test and/or deploy innovative driver and/or vehicle best practices, and
technologies that will improve safety and security, and reduce the number and
severity of commercial motor vehicle crashes.
Currently, FMCSAs Office of Research and Technology conducts programs in the area of Driver Safety Performance, Commercial Vehicle Safety Performance, Carrier Compliance and Safety, Safety Systems and Technology, Cross-Cutting Safety Initiatives, and Security. The study described in the following Tech Brief was designed and developed as part of FMCSAs Research and Technology Carrier Compliance and Safety Program. The primary goal of this program is to improve the safety of all motor carriers particularly high-risk carriers by ensuring compliance with safety performance regulations set forth by the organization.
FMCSA Logo of Truck and
Bus
Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration
Office of Research and
Technology
400 Virginia Ave, SW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20024
Introduction
As part of its efforts to promote the safe transportation of hazardous materials (HM), the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) sponsored a study to assess and compare the risks posed by transporting hazardous materials and non-HM shipments in order to assist in identifying high-risk motor carriers. The results of this research study may be used in the development of a transportation risk assessment model, which will enable FMCSA to identify programs that will result in the greatest improvement in safety.
Background
In Phase I of the three-phase project, researchers assessed
the feasibility of conducting a comprehensive risk study of HM and non-HM
transportation. Specifically,
researchers chose one year, 1996, to look at the costs of transporting
flammable/combustible liquids, which represent more than 50 percent of all HM
truck transport. The study results were
published in the Hazardous Materials Risk Assessment: Year Portrait of
Hazardous Materials Accidents/Incidents and Impacts. This process was then extended to three
years of records, 1995-1997, for flammable gases (considered Class 2.1 HM) and
corrosive materials (considered Class 8 HM), which provided a preliminary
estimate of the cost impact of transporting HM shipments.
In Phase II, which is the primary focus of this Tech Brief, researchers produced an actual comparative risk assessment by calculating and comparing the costs and risks associated with transporting HM and non-HM truck shipments. The third phase of the project focused on how the HM risk information, collected during the first two phases, could be applied to the SafeStat program to help identify potentially unsafe motor carriers.
This Tech Brief summarizes the project described in the final report, Comparative Risks of Hazardous Materials and Non-Hazardous Materials Truck Shipment Accidents/Incidents, 2001, which is available on the FMCSA Web site at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/Pdfs/HMRiskFinalReport.pdf.
Purpose
The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the
calculated risks associated with the transportation of HM and non-HM
shipments. The results also will be
used to assist the FMCSA in identifying high-risk motor carriers.
Phase II Methodology
Researchers analyzed two types of HM eventsaccidents and incidents. An accident occurs when a vehicle transporting hazardous goods is involved in a collision, regardless of whether any material is spilled or released in the atmosphere. An incident occurs when a vehicle transporting hazardous goods spills some of the cargo, but is not involved in a collision. An incident resulting in the spill or release of hazardous materials during loading or unloading is defined as a loading/unloading incident.
Researchers calculated the risks associated with each of the nine HM classes to obtain the overall HM risk. The Federal Code of Regulations (FCR) lists nine classes of hazardous materials as shown in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Classes of
Hazardous Materials |
|
Class |
Hazardous
Material |
|
1 |
Explosives |
|
|
Potential for mass detonation likely Potential for mass detonation unlikely |
|
2 |
Gases |
|
|
Flammable Non-Flammable Poisonous |
|
3 |
Liquids (flammable and combustible) |
|
4 |
Flammable solids |
|
|
Spontaneously combustible materials Dangerous when wet materials |
|
5 |
Oxidizers and organic peroxides |
|
6 |
Toxic materials and infectious substances |
|
7 |
Radioactive materials |
|
8 |
Corrosive materials |
|
9 |
Miscellaneous dangerous goods |
[508 Copy:
Table 1 Lists the 9 Classes of
Hazardous Materials. They are:
Class
1 is Explosives, two categories: Potential for mass detonation likely, and
Potential for mass detonation unlikely.
Class
2, Gases, three categories: flammable, non-flammable, and poisonous.
Class
3, Liquids of the flammable and combustible type.
Class
4, Flammable Solids, two categories: spontaneously combustible materials and
dangerous when wet materials.
Class
5, Oxidizers and Organic Peroxides.
Class
6, Toxic Materials and Infectious Substances.
Class
7, Radioactive Materials.
Class
8, Corrosive Materials.
Class
9, Miscellaneous dangerous goods.]
Completing Phase II of the project enabled the comparison between the risks of transporting any HM class to the risks of transporting other HM classes and non-HM shipments. Researchers used data from a variety of sources including federal and state databases, local authorities and private companies. For the final analysis, data from 1990 through the beginning of 1999 were used to create an annual estimate of HM impacts. To derive an estimate of the annual economic impact of HM accidents and incidents, a number of considerations were taken into account including the following five-step process:
Injuries and deaths
Cleanup
Property damage
Evacuation
Product loss
Traffic incident delay
Environmental damage
The Hazardous Materials Information System (HMIS), a database that tracks highway transportation events, was an important source for estimating the cost impacts of accidents and incidents associated with product loss, cleanup costs, and property damage. Injuries and fatalities were valued to be the amount the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) would be willing to spend to avoid an injury or death. This averaged out to be $200,000 to avoid an injury and $2,800,000 to avoid a fatality. Delays caused by traffic events were identified as the total number of people delayed at an incident or accident multiplied by $15 per hour. Environmental damage was identified as the size of an average spill plus the value of environmental contamination (determined by an average of 30 legal settlements).
Results from the study were reported in terms
of Frequency, Hazardous Materials Impacts/Costs, Non-Hazardous Materials
Impacts/Costs, Comparative Risks, and Accident Rate and Cost per Mile,
specifically:
The average frequency of HM accidents for one year was estimated to be 2,484 accidents, with 768 resulting in the release of hazardous materials. The average annual frequency of HM incidents was 1,455. The average annual frequency for loading/unloading incidents was 10,746.
Shipments of flammable and combustible liquids (considered Class 3 HM), as well as corrosive materials (considered Class 8 HM) accounted for about 64 percent of total HM release accidents and 52 percent of non-release accidents. HM classes 3 and 8 also were involved in about 77 percent of the annual enroute incidents where an HM release occurred, and 84 percent of all loading and unloading incidents.
HM shipments make up between 4 and 8 percent of all transported shipments. The estimated total cost for HM truck accidents and incidents for a period of one year is about $1.2 billion. HM accidents account for about 89 percent of the total cost impact, or $1 billion.
Accidents that resulted in a release of hazardous materials cost $416 million and accounted for about 40 percent of enroute accident cost impacts. While accidents that resulted in fire or explosion made up only about 12 percent of the total number of HM release accidents, they were estimated to cost $139 million, or about 34 percent of the total cost of HM release accidents. Non-release accidents made up about 60 percent of the total annual accident cost impacts while enroute incidents with HM release and loading/unloading incidents accounted for about 11 percent of the total cost impacts.
Not surprisingly, the costs associated with injuries and fatalities from HM accidents accounted for about 80 percent of all impact costs for enroute accidents. For both release and non-release accidents combined, injuries represented about 40 percent of the impact costs, and fatalities represented about 40 percent of all impact costs for enroute accidents. Delays caused by traffic events for both release and non-release accidents added up to about 9 percent of the total costs. Environmental damage, clean up, and evacuations accounted for the remaining 3 percent of cost impact.
There were approximately 126,880 accidents for one year involving the transport of non-HM shipments and, after compensating for under-reporting, approximately 109,779 injuries and 5,009 fatalities. Although primarily due to a much larger volume of transport activity, the annual economic impact of non-HM accidents is over $43 billionconsiderably higher than for HM accidents. All but $7 billion of that cost resulted from injuries and fatalities.
All HM release and non-release accidents and incidents for transporting the various categories of HM shipments averaged about $414,000 per event for one year. All non-HM accidents/incidents averaged about $340,000 per event. Over a period of one year, the average cost per HM accident/incident with a release was about $536,000. There is even greater contrast between the average cost impact of an HM release accident/incident resulting in fire or explosion compared to the average cost of a non-HM accident/incident.
The average cost of HM and non-HM motor carrier events are shown below in Table 2.
Table 2.
Average Costs of HM and Non-HM Motor
Carrier Events |
|||
|
type of EVENT |
average cost |
Percentage of non-HM crash |
Average Traffic delay |
|
Non-HM Event |
$340,000 |
---- |
2 hours |
|
All HM Event |
$414,000 |
122% |
-- |
|
HM Event with Spill/Release |
$536,000 |
158% |
5 hours |
|
HM Event with Fire |
$1.2 million |
353% |
8 hours |
|
HM Event with Explosion |
$2.1 million |
617% |
12 hours |
[508 Copy:
Table 2 shows the Averge Costs of
Hazardous Materials (abbreviated HM) and Non-Hazardous Materials (abbreviated
Non-HM) for specific Motor Carrier Events.
The table has four columns, labeled (from left to right) Type of Event,
Average Cost, Percentage of Non-Hazardous Materials Crash, and Average Traffic
Delay.
The specifics are as follows:
For Non-HM Events, the average cost is
$340,000, there isnt any percentage given for Non-Hazardous Materials Crash,
and the Average Traffic Delay is 2 hours.
For All HM Events, the average cost is
$414,000. HM Events account for 122% of
Non-Hazardous Materials Crash. Average
traffic delay is not given.
HM Events with Spills or Releases account
for an average cost of $536,000. They
make up 158% of Non-Hazardous Materials Crash, and cause an average traffic
delay of 5 hours.
HM Events that include Fire, cause an
average cost of $1.2 million, account for 353% of Non-
HM Crash, and cause, on average, 8 hours
of traffic delay.
Finally, HM Events that include an Explosion cost an average of $2.1 million, encompass 617% of Non-HM Crash, and account for an average traffic delay of 12 hours.]
The estimated number of annual accidents and incidents can be converted into rates by using annual vehicle miles of HM operation. Based on estimated mileage from the 1997 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS), the accident rate for transporting non-HM is 0.73 per million vehicle miles and is more than double the average HM accident rate of 0.32 per million vehicle-miles. While the average cost for a single HM accident is higher than for a single non-HM accident, the overall cost of non-HM accidents clearly dominates due to a large disparity in shipment volume between HM and non-HM shipments.
While mileage numbers provided a general measure of difference, more rigorous comparisons must await further refinements in the accuracy of CFS mileage numbers.
In conclusion, the findings of this study can be used to increase our understanding of the key risk contributors of transporting HM and non-HM shipments. The results allow for risk comparisons to be made between HM and non-HM shipments by establishing a general dollar estimate of the financial impact, rather than a precise valuation. It is anticipated that meaningful research and policy inferences can be derived for risk management purposes. This report demonstrates the usefulness of a methodology for estimating the number of accidents and incidents for a 1-year period.
Several findings were reported from the results of the study. The results suggest:
Although public databases contain useful information for conducting risk assessments, they are deficient in a number of areas that can be improved. The research study suggests that better coordination efforts among the multiple agencies that collect transportation data would correct data collection inconsistencies. Also, the collection of data should be done in coordination with other datasets to enhance cross-referencing capabilities, which would enable FMCSA to improve its safety performance monitoring abilities. The benefit of such improvements would allow for the availability of information and a more economical way of maintaining the databasesall of which can be used to help identify high-risk motor carriers and improve the safety of transporting hazardous and non-hazardous materials.
Future Action
Applying
the results of the risk assessment study to the SafeStat algorithm (an
instrument used to measure the safety fitness of motor carriers) is currently
underway. Phase III of the study
analyzed the impact of HM on the carrier selection methodology and made
recommendations on the inclusion of hazardous materials risks, which are
currently under review by the FMCSA.
Comparative Risks of Hazardous Materials and Non-Hazardous Materials Truck Shipment Accidents/Incidents, FMCSA, Washington, DC, March 2001.
Hazardous Materials Risk Assessment: Phase I (Tech Brief), Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carrier Research and Standards, Publication No. FHWA-MCRT-99-013, Washington, DC, June 1999.
Researcher: This study was performed by Battelle, 505
King Ave. Columbus, OH 43201-2693.
Contract No. DTFH61-98-C-00060.
Distribution: This Tech Brief is being distributed according to a standard distribution. Direct distribution is being made to the Service Centers and Divisions.
Availability: Phase one of the study final report is
available from the National Technical Information Service (PB99-150245).
Notice: This Tech Brief is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The Tech Brief provides a synopsis of the studys final publication. The Tech Brief does not establish policies or regulations, nor does it imply USDOT endorsement of the conclusions or recommendations. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or their use.
Web Site: All FMCSA Tech and Analysis Briefs may be
accessed at:
Technical Writer: Craig Steinberg, C2 Technologies, Inc.
US Department of Transportation Logo
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
July, 2002
Publication No. FMCSA-RT-02-090