The
HM TAG - The HM TAG held its Fall meeting the week of October 30, 2000
in Charleston, SC. The focus of the meeting was on planning the upcoming
Shipper Check 2001. Other activities included developing a HM Package
Inspection compliance review, improving the HM Package Inspection Program
(HM PIP) computer software, updating the HM ETA Package, and reviewing
and updating HM CAPRI violation cites.
The TAG also took the second afternoon of the meeting to conduct dock
checks and hazardous materials package inspections using the HM PIP software.
At this meeting the HM TAG welcomed new members Tim Phillips (Southern
Service Center), Tony Kryfka (VA Div.), Steve Hurst (TX Div.), and Sgt.
David Beasley (IL State Police).
The Cargo
Tank TAG - The Fall Cargo Tank TAG meeting took place the last
week of October in Chicago, IL. One reason for the choice of location
is that the National Tank Truck Carriers (NTTC) was also holding their
annual cargo tank maintenance seminar. On Tuesday, TAG members participated
in the maintenance seminar through interaction with the participants and
presentations by Joe Delorenzo, Danny Shelton and Ted Turner of FMCSA
and Ron Kirkpatrick and Phil Olson of RSPA.
On Wednesday and Thursday the TAG met to discuss its regular agenda of
TAG activities, technical issues and policy recommendations. Covered subjects
included the TAG’s assistance to the Alaska Division in conducting
compliance reviews, future strike force activities at the Southern Border,
interactive seminars, new cargo tank interpretations from RSPA, enforcement
follow-ups on cargo tank facilities, and proper classification of petroleum
contaminated water.
Alaska Strike
Force Activity - At the request of Alaska State Director John<
Quartuccio, the Cargo Tank TAG recruited three teams of investigators
to go to Alaska and conduct cargo tank inspection facility compliance
reviews. The State Director identified lack of compliance with the 49
CFR Part 180 cargo tank inspection/test requirements as a serious safety
problem.
During this effort which took place over three separate weeks, seven compliance
reviews were conducted on cargo tank carriers or cargo tank inspection/test
facilities resulting in four enforcement cases for $33,290.
Violations discovered included failing to conduct tests and inspections,
improper tests and inspections, improper cargo tank repairs, improper
certification of cargo tank compliance, failure to provide HM training,
no HM registration, and various paperwork violations.
ONEDOT HM Strike Force – During the week of November
13, the California division office participated in the inland Empire HazStrike.
This ONEDOT activity conducted in Southern California involved RSPA, FMCSA,
FAA, FRA, and the Coast Guard. Twelve teams with multimodal representation
visited HM shippers to determine compliance.
Sixty-six HM shippers were visited resulting in 35 pending enforcement
actions.
FMCSA HM Highlights
Page 2
January 2001
COHMED
The Research and Special Programs Administration hosts a semi-annual Conference
on Hazardous Materials Education (COHMED). It works to foster coordination,
cooperation, and communication between Federal and state agencies and
tribal nations having regulatory and enforcement responsibility for the
safe transportation of hazardous materials.
The information presented at the COHMED meetings on HM regulations, the
HM industry, HM laws, emergency response, instructor training and enforcement
activities can benefit any FMCSA personnel with any responsibility for
HM including investigators, state directors, specialists, and legal staff.
The next meeting is April 22-26 in Bloomington, MN. Go to http://hazmat.dot.gov/cohmett.htm
for more information.

Why Emphasize
HM Safety?
This is the second in a continuing series of looks into the risk posed
by the transportation of HM. The above picture was taken at Plankinton,
SD High School on November 11, 2000 after a propane explosion killed two
school staff members. The propane leak that caused the explosion occurred
earlier in the day when a truck unloading propane had a hose leak.
Technical
Issues
Q1: There is a requirement in the Hazmat Law [49 U.S.C.
5110(e)] that shipping papers be maintained for 1 year.
Although this is not yet a regulation, can a HM shipper or carrier be
cited for not maintaining shipping papers?
A1: Yes. 49 U.S.C. 5110(e) was recently incorporated
into Capri as a violation citation. Please see a December 27, 2000 memo
from the Assistant Administrator explaining how this violation citation
should be used.
Q2: Do nurse tanks have to be repaired by a facility that holds
a National Board “R” Stamp?
A2: Yes. Section 173.315(m) authorizes nurse tanks
that meet the requirements of the ASME Code. To meet the requirements
of the ASME Code the tank must be repaired by a facility holding a “R”
Stamp.
Q3:
Section 172.328(b) requires that a cargo tank transporting a Class 2
material (gas) be marked with the proper shipping name or an appropriate
common name. If the name of the company is Joe’s Propane and this
is printed on the side of the truck, does this fulfill this requirement?
A3: No. The name of the company can’t be used
to satisfy the marking requirements in 172.328.
Q4: If the Joe’s Propane truck, from the example
above, is transporting butane, would having the word Propane on the
side of the truck be a prohibited marking in violation of 172.303?
A4: No. The name of the company (that is required
to be on the vehicle by 49 CFR 390.21) is not a HM marking and would
not be a violation of 172.303.
New HM Search
Capabilities
Fred Mcgraw of the Midwest Service Center gave a presentation at both
the HM TAG meeting and the Cargo Tank TAG meeting on HM data available
on the Midwest Service Center’s Information and Analysis Internet
Website. The Website is at http://safesum.fhwa.dot.gov.
Among the features Fred demonstrated were the abilities to search RSPA’s
Registration Database to determine if a company met the HM Registration
requirements.
Investigators also have the ability to search RSPA’s cargo tank
facility registration database or Chemtrec’s customer list though
this Website.
HM Registration
Information
HM registration requirements have changed to no longer require that the
RSPA HM Registration letter be carried on the vehicle. The new requirement
is that the registration number be on the vehicle. So the question becomes,
if I only have a registration number which has no dates, how can I be
sure the company is registered for the current year???
The answer is that the letter or letters at the end of the registration
number indicate the registration year.
The HM Registration
year indicator is as follows:
A = 1992-93
B = 1993-94
C = 1994-95
D = 1995-96
E = 1996-97
F = 1997-98
G = 1998-99
H = 1999-2000
I = 2000-01
IJ = 2000-02
IK = 2000-03
J = 2001-02
JK = 2001-03
JL = 2001-04
K = 2002
Note: Beginning in
2000-2001, companies may register for up to three years. |